Author Topic: The ol' I/V and op-amp controversy  (Read 7897 times)

Gen. Dreedle

  • Commander, Alabama wing, Confederate Air Farce
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • View Profile
The ol' I/V and op-amp controversy
« on: June 06, 2010, 09:07:32 AM »
I ran across this, somewhere. Won't say where, as it is not somewhere any people with any intelligence are found.

(No, it is not Greaser's Palace. A few steps below that. Maybe several.)

Anyway, it was posted a few years back, so no need to post the trivial details of who, when or why. Just putting it here, just to see who it sucks in!

"Andy_c's analysis is fundamentally flawed in that not only does 8x oversampling not reduce slew requirements to 1/8, but a Sigma Delta modulator like the pcm1794 that he mentions could actually slew full scale more than once per sample received from the 8x FIR filter.

That said, I'm not saying that people's ears are broken and that all opamp I/V automatically sounds horrible. But there is really no way ir can compete, and there's hardly reason to use opamps when alternatives are not that much more expensive. Except I guess in portables."

(I left in the typos! Just to be accurate.)

Anyway, the analysis he was referring to was at Greaser's Palace. You can read it here:

http://www.diyhifi.org/forums/viewtopic.php?p=5091#p5091

OK, your turn to comment.

Jocko
« Last Edit: June 06, 2010, 04:18:10 PM by Jocko »
"Major Danby, sir."
"Danby. D-A-N-B-Y."
"Take him out and shoot him."
"Sir?"
"I said take him out and shoot him. Can't you hear?"

seagreen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • View Profile
Re: The ol' I/V and op-amp controversy
« Reply #1 on: June 06, 2010, 01:59:11 PM »
I commented the first time.  Got excoriated.  Learned my lesson, more or less.

Slightly OT...  Oddly enough, I've been working on a somewhat higher speed DAC system of late.  2.5 GHz sampling rate.  Anyway, guess what one of the challenges is?  Making sure the various bypassing arrays don't have resonant points. 

Come to think of it, I was excoriated this time as well by a different set of guys.  I tell ya - I don't get no respect.
No double blind testing was used in the making of this post.

Gen. Dreedle

  • Commander, Alabama wing, Confederate Air Farce
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • View Profile
Re: The ol' I/V and op-amp controversy
« Reply #2 on: June 06, 2010, 04:19:40 PM »
I need to extend the "courtesy edit time", to about one day. I keep finding typos I missed the first time. Grrr.........

And you worry about being excoriated.

Jocko
"Major Danby, sir."
"Danby. D-A-N-B-Y."
"Take him out and shoot him."
"Sir?"
"I said take him out and shoot him. Can't you hear?"

seagreen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • View Profile
Re: The ol' I/V and op-amp controversy
« Reply #3 on: July 30, 2010, 04:05:06 PM »
Note the surface mount parts not in the "signal path".  (How many things were wrong with that sentence?)

http://www.psaudio.com/ps/products/description/perfectwave-dac?cat=audio
No double blind testing was used in the making of this post.

Gen. Dreedle

  • Commander, Alabama wing, Confederate Air Farce
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • View Profile
Re: The ol' I/V and op-amp controversy
« Reply #4 on: July 31, 2010, 12:54:12 PM »
Why are you kvetching? It has 7 inputs, including I2S. What else can you possibly want? Uses mostly through hole................it has to be good!

Plus, this gem:

Quote
The PerfectWave series is assembled, programmed and tested at our new production facility in Boulder Colorado.  Instead of the typical production line process, each PWD is hand built by one person from beginning to end.  There is a measure of pride of workmanship that goes into every one of these PerfectWave products and it shows from the moment you open the unit up and plug it in.

Translation: We only have one guy building these, in his garage. At least, that is how that would be translated if any of us had a their own stereo company. No farming it out to fancy assembly houses, who make a big pile of them, all at once. No, just one guy, hunched over the PCB, doing it all by himself.

Sure sounds that way to me.

Hmmm................that gives me an idea..............if I took...............

Jocko
"Major Danby, sir."
"Danby. D-A-N-B-Y."
"Take him out and shoot him."
"Sir?"
"I said take him out and shoot him. Can't you hear?"

seagreen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • View Profile
Re: The ol' I/V and op-amp controversy
« Reply #5 on: July 31, 2010, 06:23:00 PM »
Guess no ball grid arrays then.

Those itty bitty parts, like the DAC for example, sure look like surface mount parts to me.  But I've certainly been wrong before.

I could also swear that I read somewhere that the DAC was somehow in the signal path.  It may have been in the same article that I read that the DAC was an integrated circuit, too.

No double blind testing was used in the making of this post.

Gen. Dreedle

  • Commander, Alabama wing, Confederate Air Farce
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • View Profile
Re: The ol' I/V and op-amp controversy
« Reply #6 on: August 03, 2010, 06:20:35 AM »
Signal path = stuff connected to the output jack.

Right?

Jocko
"Major Danby, sir."
"Danby. D-A-N-B-Y."
"Take him out and shoot him."
"Sir?"
"I said take him out and shoot him. Can't you hear?"

seagreen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • View Profile
Re: The ol' I/V and op-amp controversy
« Reply #7 on: August 09, 2010, 06:19:24 PM »
You mean like the cabinet?

I was wondering... How hard would it be to build a more-or-less discrete R2R ladder DAC (I really mean the converter itself)?  I bet with the right FPGA programming, some very good tolerance resistors, and some really good modern CMOS switches it's probably doable.
No double blind testing was used in the making of this post.

MystereoN

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • The Brave die once, a coward dies a thousand times
    • View Profile
Re: The ol' I/V and op-amp controversy
« Reply #8 on: August 10, 2010, 03:45:47 PM »
yeah, with tight layout and super cooling 64 bits is possible  ;D ;D ;D
Along with 64 bit OS like Vista this should be a sonic killer  ;)
http://www.sonicillusions.co.uk/discrete_dac.htm

Cheap source of energy needed for cooling
http://www.wonderhowto.com/how-to-run-home-fusion-reactor-64450/

How it sounds...
"World's first 64 bit R2R DAC coupled with fusion reactor"
Never argue with a fool,
they will drag you down to their level,
then beat you with their experience!!!

seagreen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • View Profile
No double blind testing was used in the making of this post.

Gen. Dreedle

  • Commander, Alabama wing, Confederate Air Farce
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • View Profile
Re: The ol' I/V and op-amp controversy
« Reply #10 on: August 11, 2010, 06:55:42 AM »
MSB, eh...............

Back when I was active in the world of building high-end stuff, probably my most famous "claim to fame" was my feedback-less transimpedance I/V. I 'splained some of it, to a guy who worked at our dealer, in Chicago. About 6 months later, he told me they had a new MSB unit in, and it also had a similar I/V.

He proceeded to tell me he 'splained what I 'splained to him to Mark Brasfield. Aka, MSB Technologies. And apologized for opening his big mouth to a competitor.

And some folks still don't understand why I am stingy with what I know, sometimes.

Jocko
"Major Danby, sir."
"Danby. D-A-N-B-Y."
"Take him out and shoot him."
"Sir?"
"I said take him out and shoot him. Can't you hear?"

seagreen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • View Profile
Re: The ol' I/V and op-amp controversy
« Reply #11 on: August 11, 2010, 07:55:51 AM »
"Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery."

Jackal barf...
No double blind testing was used in the making of this post.

Gen. Dreedle

  • Commander, Alabama wing, Confederate Air Farce
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • View Profile
Re: The ol' I/V and op-amp controversy
« Reply #12 on: February 09, 2012, 08:40:01 AM »
Oh, dear...................they are at it...........yet again..............

Quote
Folks have resorted to high distortion high bjt count open loop transimpedance I/V that really never caught on.

So............I guess anything over 0.001% distortion is considered high. Yeah..........never seemed to worry that much about 0.01% distortion. Now I know what my basic problem is!

"You mean your personality disorder?"

Other than the obvious.

All I can say is "Thankfully, it never caught on." That is why you hobbyists will always remain hobbyists.

"You rack disciprine!"

No, you lack finesse! (Ha! Two times, for the same pun, in the same day. Should I go for the trifecta?)
"Major Danby, sir."
"Danby. D-A-N-B-Y."
"Take him out and shoot him."
"Sir?"
"I said take him out and shoot him. Can't you hear?"

seagreen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • View Profile
Re: The ol' I/V and op-amp controversy
« Reply #13 on: February 09, 2012, 06:08:50 PM »
Personality distortion...
No double blind testing was used in the making of this post.

MystereoN

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • The Brave die once, a coward dies a thousand times
    • View Profile
Re: The ol' I/V and op-amp controversy
« Reply #14 on: February 09, 2012, 08:23:26 PM »
same situation as with Japanese audio in '80
"Look at this new amp with 0,001% distortion...."
"Nah, look at new Sony Vollverstärker, even better with 0,00001%..."
 ;D
Never argue with a fool,
they will drag you down to their level,
then beat you with their experience!!!